I put some 192.168 addresses in the adminip.txt to limit the connection will not from WAN due to security.
In parallel I bridge a virtual hub to eth0 so that all internet traffic will route through VPN and allow me to access server subnet. It works perfect. However in this situation I cannot connect to the server by SoftEther VPN Server Manager. It gives me "Connection to the server failed. Check network connection and make sure that address and port number of destination server are correct". How to make it?
SoftEther VPN Server Manager cannot access server via VPN
-
- Posts: 20
- Joined: Sun Feb 15, 2015 3:25 pm
-
- Posts: 551
- Joined: Wed Jul 24, 2013 12:09 pm
Re: SoftEther VPN Server Manager cannot access server via VP
It seems unclear.
Can you draw your network topology?
Can you draw your network topology?
-
- Posts: 20
- Joined: Sun Feb 15, 2015 3:25 pm
Re: SoftEther VPN Server Manager cannot access server via VP
I followed https://www.softether.org/4-docs/1-manu ... on_Sources and filled the 192.168.1.1 in the adminip.txt. I set my computer IP to 192.168.1.1 and the server IP is 192.168.1.6. In this situation, the Server Manager cannot be connected.
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
-
- Posts: 551
- Joined: Wed Jul 24, 2013 12:09 pm
Re: SoftEther VPN Server Manager cannot access server via VP
Make sure that the device for local bridge is not the same as the one listening on 192.168.1.6.
-
- Posts: 20
- Joined: Sun Feb 15, 2015 3:25 pm
Re: SoftEther VPN Server Manager cannot access server via VP
Then how to make the device for local bridge is not the same as the one listening on 192.168.1.6? I got one eth0 only and it has been bridged to a virtual hub.
On the other hand I am using xrdp as remote desktop on my CentOS server. The rdp connection freeze at connecting stage if I connect via VPN. It looks like the same situation.
On the other hand I am using xrdp as remote desktop on my CentOS server. The rdp connection freeze at connecting stage if I connect via VPN. It looks like the same situation.
-
- Posts: 2458
- Joined: Mon Feb 24, 2014 11:03 am