I am not using bridge together with secureNAT.
I am very sure that secureNAT has some serious performance issues that it periodically shoot my CPU utilization to 100% for 20-30min even there is NO connection exists! When there is one connection, the average CPU utilization is about 20-30%, which is 10X of ubuntu's l2tpd. I am using a double core 2.0G xeon with 4G mem
Please, softEther team, this is not "high performance" you advocated, and there must be some performance bug, please fix it
Secure NAT kills performance
-
inten
- Posts: 370
- Joined: Fri Oct 18, 2013 8:15 am
Re: Secure NAT kills performance
I am not a member of SoftEther team but they have promised nothing about vNAT performance so far. Moreover, if you read the documentation you would know they suggest to avoid using of built-in NAT due to performance issue of it.
-
avel
- Posts: 30
- Joined: Sat May 24, 2014 2:59 pm
Re: Secure NAT kills performance
Best way to make virtual adapter and bridge it with SoftEther virtual hub. But I personaly still can't find good way to make it on FreeBSD. (On Linux you can make it from SE GUI)
-
avel
- Posts: 30
- Joined: Sat May 24, 2014 2:59 pm
Re: Secure NAT kills performance
Reinstalling to Debian, as I understood that local bridging will not work with FreeBSD(for virtual tap)