So far, I have been testing with Bridge and S-NAT modes successfully, but I must confirm that the technology has been catched by the Great Firewall of China already. I tested both implementation ( Bridge and S-NAT ) for like 5 days, it worked good until I tested Bridge and the DNS started to malfunction. After that, I remade a new server and used S-NAT again and now it looks like for some reason the firewall has detected something and the DNS now malfunction and the connection is pretty unreliable. It is not a problem of my servers because I have destroyed and recreated the servers 5 times with new public IP's and the same thing happens.
EDIT : I just added a new user ( a friend on another location in china ) And seems that its only me who is having this DNS relay problem ???? Why ? Does the firewall keeps the MAC information of your NIC after detecting "intrusive" packets and ban you or something ? Should I spoof my MAC ?
Just wanted to report and see if you have some idea too.
EDIT: I tested on three different users and all of our connections gets detected and down.
SoftEther S-NAT mode gets detected by GWF
-
- Posts: 9
- Joined: Mon Sep 01, 2014 5:09 pm
SoftEther S-NAT mode gets detected by GWF
Last edited by cfunk on Wed Sep 17, 2014 7:57 am, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 2458
- Joined: Mon Feb 24, 2014 11:03 am
Re: SoftEther S-NAT mode gets detected by GWF
S-NAT or LocalBridge or your MAC address can't be detected by GFW.
GFW detects TCP port of your VPN Server.
Did you use default TCP port?
GFW detects TCP port of your VPN Server.
Did you use default TCP port?
-
- Posts: 9
- Joined: Mon Sep 01, 2014 5:09 pm
Re: SoftEther S-NAT mode gets detected by GWF
Yes, I used TCP 443. Should I use another port ? As far as I know, using both bridge and S-NAT on port 443 is unreliable, gets detected and down.
-
- Posts: 2458
- Joined: Mon Feb 24, 2014 11:03 am
Re: SoftEther S-NAT mode gets detected by GWF
Yes. Please try another port.