64Bit ARM Version

[cloudtronics]

We are experimenting with the latest odriod C2 which is based on 64-bit SBC Amlogic ARM® Cortex®-A53(ARMv8) 2Ghz quad core CPUs 64Bit with ubuntu mate.

We would like to run softether on this SBC but my team have indicated we need a Softether 64Bit ARM version to accommodate this requirement.

Is there any developments for this ARM 64Bit version?

[cloudtronics]

Update,


My team have managed to compile Softether on this 64Bit ARM processor and is running well.

[andiling]

Since the RPi3 has no stable aarch64 os yet it runs in 32bit v7 mode with the standard images. For those you can download the arm_eabi-32bit version provided and you do not need to build SoftEther yourself.

[lwk523]

Update,


My team have managed to compile Softether on this 64Bit ARM processor and is running well.

Hi Sir,
Could you share with me how to compile? I totally i have no idea where to start


Thanks

[mm2061]

Update,


My team have managed to compile Softether on this 64Bit ARM processor and is running well.

Please coul share your compile ? I'm trying to compile for a surface prox processo ARM SQ2.
THZ

[feichtinger]

Are there SoftEther users of it?
Maybe of ArchLinux ones?
I'd like to have contact!! ASAP
arch.siebert@a1.net

[feichtinger]

Well, READING every book it is disgusting for pushing
every page from right to left every few seconds again and
again, who created the pages? Is there any recomondation
for changing it?

ARM, machines are tested fot SoftEther but no archlinux the
group for that is not good

[matthias feichtinger]

Well, with help of YANDEX I should be able to make it for Raspberry 4
and so with Raspberry 5-
Only the horrorgang of ARCH-Linux AND ARM, therefore AL ARM
cannot be revommended for madness in behavior, geman Nazi.
Sorry! ARM is fine, really, Arch really not bad, can perfectly substituted
by DEBIAN, both work fine togerher and now? SoftEther server! :-)

[matthias feichtinger]

Another surprise with Raspberries, I am talking about 5 which I down loaded. I didn't care about coloured shit and the shit I got isn't from X. Well, but not well. On the asrock there is pure, stable. clear, proofed and tested 12 with one mistake: KDE. I know it because of using it since 3,5. It is in use since there. With 13 screens which I use all of them from time to time as a shock to Windowsbastards, well gates, the littlegirlfucker. But with Raspb 5 I got only one screen so I found
another littrlegirlfuckercrap which I purged. No X anymore. This is no problem, no, this is great, I use Xfce4 now. And debian - perfect!
Another mystery, I used SoftEther brought by apt. No good Idea, not at all. *doc are missing, *examples, explanations. I had to find that anywhere, I've got it and many questions about SoftEther
are answered there. One should get it and read it carefully :-) I'll get SoftEther now normally. As opensource things can be gotten even from US-criminals.

[matthias feichtinger]

Which version of SuftEther?

[feichtinger]

Well but not good: Raspberry
This things doesn't boot with any OSimage.
With the own one? Not so bad.
How? Why? Raspberry has to boot from Memory and doesn 't know it. How does it start? There is the chip with memory and this can be handled. And there the boot-partition can be found. Don't know how, but this sufficient they say. This boot partition is secretly made by Raspberry-image. Crazy? No, English. And there is the boot-menue. Genial? Oh no! Mad. So it's English. Well but not at all good.
Next, we all have to be young, dynamic and modern and therefore we have to ban X, Thousends of programmers, young, dynamic and modern, and everyone wants it to be spread. So by and by one can have tons of progs .... never needed. 2072 installed 100086 not 124749 vrt.
Raspberry users are never asked. They see the list of wayland thingies and can purge it, the KDE and GNOME too. Linux works. I use Xfce4. Maybe Debian. Later. And Korean SOC again.